Видео

yeah this video was def poorly prepared and this guy does not really understand the issue. Downloading or listening to music without paying is def not even close to building a clone machine to profit from... the results of training is intellectual property that the AI company will make money from. If they were building it for humanity i might think differently...

I support them. Ai is cool and idgaf about artists rights.

Why would anyone defend the scum of the RIAA?

why? Are you in the music business? Do you know the history of it? Have you dealt with them? Have you communicated with labels? Have you been involved in the music software business for 15 years as I have? Do those things and you will better understand.

If someone is inspired by a song and then makes their own song using the same chords and structure, would you call that a "clone"? Because that's half of the popular songs. I don't think you can grasp what I am talking about here, and I don't think you understand the music business at all, nor do you understand AI training. But hey, you are entitled to your wrong opinion. Enjoy listing to music on your phone....something the RIAA didn't want to exist.

It sounds like you have a mis-match between your computer and the H1. Change the Sample Rate on your PC and DAW to match the H1

Nobody cares where the song came from as long as it sounds good.

​@@mikb5587 Whether people care or not where music comes from has nothing to do with anything I said, but your statement is not even true. People 100% care where music comes from, not only do people have favorite soundtracks, bands and musicians that greatly influence their listening decisions, people care about their favorite artist and will often stick to the music they know and already like even if they hear something foreign to it that "sounds good". If people didnt care where music came from they would never go to live performances and only have favorite songs in isolation.

you seem to be under the impression that everyone can learn every instrument and play them flawlessly. should the un-talented be barred from musical expression? should the person who can't sing be barred from creating a voice to express their emotion? I too can makeup a song on the spot and play it with guitar or bass or piano or drums, or basically anything....but who's going to hear it without recording it? You're just gonna play in the street? You're going to have a concert where you make up music on the spot...no ones buying that ticket unless you already have a well-established library and are famous. Do you cook every meal you eat from scratch? Do you hunt your meat? Raise chickens for the eggs? Milk the cows? Or do you go to the grocery store and buy pre-made food you can throw in the microwave, pre-packaged meat, canned vegetables, a gallon of milk? A lot of people think you miss out by not hunting your meat, or milking your own cows, or cooking your own food from scratch every meal. I could say you are not really experiencing food, and you don't have an appreciation for the animals and the land - but do you care? No. Same thing for AI music. AI simply allows people to get the sound in their head much faster and without talent or skill or time. The same way you can grab a burger at McDonalds without growing wheat, making buns, milking cows to create cheese, harvesting cows for meat, crushing tomatos for Ketchup, etc...

@@BenoniStudio Relying on AI is barring them from musical expression, they aren't expressing themselves, they are commissioning a corporate software to generate music that is technically some other musician's expression since it is built off the back of those musician's work. It can not even be described as "their voice" at that point. And besides some serious debilitating conditions I believe practically everyone CAN learn an instrument and/or sing to a great degree. Flawlessly? Who knows, but this AI is anything but flawless, and it's flaws are not human but rather algorithmic and lack any character or charm. As for recording, nearly everyone has a smartphone nowadays, recording is trivial. Also recording shouldn't be anyone's purpose for creating music, like you said in your video, most of human history people played and made music without recording. For the comment on who is going to listen and that nobody is going to go to a concert unless youre well established. Well yea duh, and I doubt anyone cares about some cheap AI generated sound that they can do for free just like you did and you have zero claim to since you didn't even make it. And I highly doubt anyone cares to go to a concert and watch someone prompt a website. No one is buying THAT ticket either. If your point of making music is some kind of recognition from others you've already failed with suno AI I also think your food analogy isn't quite adequate for this situation. As there's a difference between merely being a consumer and producer of a food. No one who buys food fools themselves into thinking they made it themselves. Its more like telling a chef your order and thinking you're the one cooking the food. The mentality is also completely different. People eat a meal to satisfy hunger, outside of survival situations chefs in culinary arts and hunters aren't necessarily doing that because they are hungry, but because its fun or enjoyable in its own right. Also I should even point out with your McD example, the less control over your food and the more automated, streamlined and cheap it gets the more unhealthy it tends to be and likely to conflict with your eating preferences and taste. I think any customer of fast food would greatly benefit just making a meal at home. Now if someone is simply using the AI because they just want to listen to someone else's music, fine, but that doesn't seem to be the primary motivator as there's already good and better music easily accessible and I've already seen plenty of people fooling themselves into thinking they and not the AI+other artist its built on made something which is also included in the marketing language of the sites themselves.

in what way? Because if you look at the site it says FREE 🤣🤣You probably downloaded the wrong thing. The video has chapters for a reason. Go to the Chapter that says HOW TO INSTALL. Next time before trying to "own" someone in RUclips comments...do a little more research 🤡

@@BenoniStudio I stand corrected it does work. I had to do the Waves complete cleanup to get it to work unfortunately. (which uninstalls every plugin)

I had problems to. Uninstalled all my v14 Waves and re-installed all as v15 and it worked straightaway.

Exactly. That's what I saw. I have bought any of their plugins after that horrible move. If this is a baiting move, then they can miss me. I was thinking of giving them one last chance. I'll wait and see

Please watch the Chapter titled: HOW TO INSTALL. This is free. 100% FREE. You DO NOT NEED ANY WAVES PLUGINS to use it. IT IS FREE. 18:31 How To Install

use the chapters. go to How to Install

AI does make it easier for people to create the sound in their head without the need for learning about music production, just like automatic transmission made it easier for people to drive without manually switching gears. Only 18% of people can drive manual these days. The same will happen to music. No one who drives automatic thinks they are cheating, they just want to get to their destination. Same will happen in music. Is that good or bad? eh? I don't know yet. Is it good that I can record music and edit music on a computer without having to manually cut tape? I'd say 'yes' - but the people who use to run tape machines probably say 'no'

I won't be at all surprise that they are doing it....!! And by taking Suno & Udio to court, actually just trying to eliminate, or at least limiting, competition because they actually were too slow to enter the market 1st!!!!

thats probably part of it to. create their own AI using their catalog and license it out.

Yes sir, thanks for the alert 👍 I will update the links for those who prefer to buy at PB and Sweetwater has it now too, so I'll include those links as well.

thanks for the super 👍

can it work...with work arounds...maybe. But this interface is not made for iPad since it relies on the Mixer app which is Windows and Mac only. If you want an interface for iPad, you'll need to choose something that either comes with a dedicated iPad app, or has the ability to adjust all the parameters from the unit itself - like the EVO 4

@@BenoniStudio THank you - very helpful- i iwll check out the evo 4

yes thats true. but most accessories you buy (at least 6 years ago when this video was made) where marketed as "Hotshoe" even when they were coldshoe. I thought that trying to use both terms would just confuse people, so I stuck with the more known "hotshoe" term

Not sure what you mean by "start again" If you want to go Hybrid just pay the $179 and either reinstall S1 and activate with the subscription license or deactivate your current install and re-activate with the sub license. (Studio One in the file bar - S1 Activation - choose Studio One+) I am assuming you own a full 6 pro license, so you will own that forever and it will be good all the way to 7. Unless you need the loops, cloud functions, plugins, etc... right now - I would wait until S1 7 comes out because the license you already have will take you to 6.9 (assuming they do a 6.9)